By English Test Coach · Updated
All sample answersAcademic Task 2 · 305 words
Older residents: weigh participation and practical support
Represent both service priorities fairly, distinguish age from individual need and explain a funding preference without dismissing social participation.
Study the method: Discussion essays: cover both views and your opinion →
Worked example: Compare different needs without age-based assumptions →
Band 7 goal: Balanced discussion
Develop and connect relevant ideas or select and compare the most useful details. This is a study route, not an examiner score assigned to the answer. How IELTS Writing is assessed.
The question
A town with a growing proportion of older residents is reviewing its community budget. Some residents think extra money should go to organised social activities for older people. Others believe practical support at home should receive priority. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The sample answer
A town with an increasing share of older residents needs to consider how its services can support different ways of living. Some people favour additional social activities, while others would prioritise practical help at home. I support giving essential home support the first claim on extra funding, while retaining accessible opportunities for residents to meet and participate.
The argument for organised activities is that they can create regular contact and a meaningful role in the community. A gardening group, for example, could allow residents to share skills and take responsibility for a common project. Someone who wants more company would then have a reason to meet others regularly, rather than wait for occasional visits. However, participation should be voluntary, and planners should not assume that every older person is lonely or interested in the same activities. Suitable venues and workable transport also matter; an attractive programme has limited value to someone who cannot reach it.
Practical support addresses a different problem: some residents may struggle with day-to-day tasks despite wanting to remain in their own homes. Help with shopping, for instance, could make it possible for a person who cannot carry heavy bags to obtain what they need without relying entirely on a neighbour. I give this provision priority because an unmet essential task can restrict daily independence even when social activities are available. Assistance should therefore follow assessed need and the resident’s preferences, rather than age alone. Such a service would require trained staff and reliable coordination, so its expansion has a real budget cost and may leave less money for new clubs.
In conclusion, social activities deserve support because they offer opportunities to contribute and connect. Nevertheless, I would first use additional funds to address gaps in essential help at home, preserving existing accessible activities and expanding them when the remaining budget allows.
Vocabulary in context
Each phrase appears in the answer above. Learn how it works, not just a replacement word.
- regular contact
- Interaction with other people that happens repeatedly over time.
Explain the opportunity for contact without assuming that all people in an age group lack it.
- day-to-day tasks
- Ordinary activities that form part of someone’s daily routine.
Name the task so the proposed support addresses a concrete difficulty.
- assessed need
- A requirement identified by examining a person’s actual circumstances.
Use the phrase to distinguish a relevant individual need from an assumption based only on age.
Now make it your own
Rewrite the judgement to give social activities greater priority. Explain the strongest case for practical help fairly, state the condition behind your preference and acknowledge what receives less funding.
For a smaller practice step, use the explanation, knowledge check and self-review exercise in Develop one idea into a paragraph.
The practice link opens the original question, not a copy of this answer.
Open the writing workspaceMore examples of this question type
Explain both viewpoints fairly and give your own judgement when the question asks for it.