Skip to main content
EnglishTest Coach

By English Test Coach

All sample answers

Academic Task 2 · 298 words

Food waste: match planning and retail measures to causes

Explain why edible food is discarded and connect household and retailer actions to those causes.

Study the method: Problems, causes and solutions: match the response to the question →

Develop the topic: Environment essays: connect actions, effects and policy limits →

Band 7 goal: Cause–solution links

Develop and connect relevant ideas or select and compare the most useful details. This is a study route, not an examiner score assigned to the answer. How IELTS Writing is assessed.

The question

Households sometimes throw away food that could still be eaten. What are the main reasons for this, and what could households and food retailers do to reduce the waste?

The sample answer

Households often waste edible food because they buy without checking what they already have, plans change and large packs appear cheaper. Retail promotions and unclear date labels can reinforce these habits. Waste can be reduced through realistic meal planning at home and smaller, clearer purchasing options from retailers rather than by asking consumers simply to be more careful.

A shopper may purchase ingredients for seven planned meals even though work, invitations or tiredness will change what the household actually cooks. Fresh items then remain hidden behind newer purchases until their quality declines. Large multi-buy offers can create the same problem when the apparent saving depends on consuming more than the family needs. Confusion between a safety deadline and a quality date may also cause usable food to be discarded. Retailers contribute when standard pack sizes are unsuitable for smaller households or promotions reward quantity rather than the amount likely to be used.

Households could plan only several days in detail, leave one meal flexible for leftovers and check cupboards before shopping. A visible ‘use first’ area in the refrigerator would make older items easier to notice. Retailers could offer smaller packs at a fair unit price, allow loose produce purchases and discount food approaching its quality date without obscuring safety information. Digital reminders may help willing customers, but they should be optional and should not require unnecessary personal data. Stores can also donate suitable surplus where safe collection arrangements already exist.

In conclusion, edible food is wasted when purchasing assumes a perfect week and retail choices encourage excessive quantities. Flexible planning, visible storage, appropriate portions and clear date information can reduce the mismatch between what people buy and what they can use. These measures target the decision points that create waste instead of relying on guilt after disposal.

Vocabulary in context

Each phrase appears in the answer above. Learn how it works, not just a replacement word.

apparent saving
A cost reduction that seems beneficial but may not produce a real benefit.

Explain why waste or another condition can remove the expected saving.

fair unit price
A reasonable cost for each item or measure regardless of pack size.

The phrase supports smaller portions when bulk packs would otherwise be disproportionately cheaper.

safe collection arrangements
Defined procedures for handling and transferring food without avoidable safety risks.

Use the phrase when redistribution depends on storage, timing and responsible recipients.

Now make it your own

Choose one cause in a single-person household and write one household action plus one retailer action that reduce it without shifting all responsibility to the shopper.

For a smaller practice step, use the explanation, knowledge check and self-review exercise in Answer the question you were given.

The practice link opens the original question, not a copy of this answer.

Open the writing workspace

More examples of this question type

Answer the requested problems or causes, then explain how specific solutions address them.