Shared school sport: give suitable existing facilities priority

Support a clear priority while testing whether available school space can give reliable public access, and acknowledge when new facilities may be justified.

Question & planning guidance Explore task 2 essays

Browse opinion / agree or disagree Browse Band 8 study goals

Study the method: Opinion essays: choose a position and develop your reasons →

Worked example: Give existing sports facilities priority under clear conditions →

Develop the topic: Health essays: compare food policies, weigh remote access and address participation barriers →

Practise this question Jump to study notes

Band 8 goal: Qualified opinions

Control precise language, qualification and evaluation without overclaiming. This is a study route, not an examiner score assigned to the answer. How IELTS Writing is assessed.

The question

Local councils should give priority to opening school sports facilities for public use outside teaching hours rather than building new sports centres. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The sample answer

Councils deciding how to expand local sports provision should examine whether school facilities can serve residents outside teaching hours. I generally support giving this option priority because it can make better use of existing space. However, that preference should depend on suitable facilities and reliable access, rather than become a rule against building anything new.

The strongest argument for shared use is that a usable sports space may already exist close to the people who need it. A school hall could, for example, accommodate a regular evening badminton session when lessons have finished. If the council and school agree on supervision, cleaning and access, residents would gain a practical opportunity without waiting for a separate centre to be designed and built. This would also give the council a way to learn which sessions attract sustained demand before committing to a larger project. Nevertheless, shared use still has operating costs; the presence of a building does not make staffing or maintenance free.

An existing school site may not offer the facilities or hours that a community requires. A hall available only late at night, for instance, may be unsuitable for residents who need an earlier session. Some sites may also need substantial changes to provide accessible entrances or changing areas. In such circumstances, simply counting unused rooms would exaggerate the capacity available to the public. A new centre could be justified if it meets a demonstrated need that shared use cannot reasonably satisfy. Councils should therefore compare usable hours, access arrangements and ongoing costs, while protecting the school’s teaching needs, before deciding that the existing site is the better option.

In conclusion, suitable school facilities deserve consideration before a council invests in a new sports centre. Shared use should take priority where it offers dependable, accessible provision, but a clear gap in what it can deliver remains a sound reason to build something different.

Qualified opinions

How the answer works

1. State a conditional but clear priority
The position answers the priority question. The conditions define the limits of agreement; they do not replace the judgement with an undecided list of advantages and disadvantages.
2. Explain why existing capacity can deserve priority
The hypothetical hall explains the practical benefit and distinguishes construction from ongoing operation. It supplies no invented saving and makes school agreement a condition rather than an assumed fact.
3. Test the limit without abandoning the position
The objection challenges the assumption that empty space equals useful capacity. The response keeps a decision rule: assess the existing option first, then justify new provision where it cannot meet the need.
4. Restate the priority and its boundary
The ending preserves the qualified agreement. It does not claim that all schools must open, that every new centre is wasteful or that access automatically produces a health outcome.

Apply the assessment criteria

Use these notes to check whether each part of the question receives a developed answer. Then compare how a short reason can become a supported point.

Compare a worked Task Response revision →

Vocabulary in context

Each phrase appears in the answer above. Learn how it works, not just a replacement word.

reliable access: An arrangement that people can depend on when they need to use a place or service.
Connect the phrase to usable opening times and agreed arrangements rather than assuming that a building’s existence guarantees access.
operating costs: The continuing expenses of running a place or service.
Distinguish these costs from designing and constructing a new building.
demonstrated need: A requirement supported by evidence about what people actually need.
Explain what gap has to be established; do not present a hypothetical demand as a measured local fact.

Now make it your own

Write a plan that gives new sports centres greater priority. Present the strongest case for sharing existing school facilities fairly, then explain the specific need or access constraint that justifies your different preference. Keep your conclusion consistent with that decision.

For a smaller practice step, use the explanation, knowledge check and self-review exercise in Answer the question you were given.

The practice link opens the original question, not a copy of this answer.

Open the writing workspace

Shared school sport: give suitable existing facilities priority

The question

The sample answer

Vocabulary in context

Now make it your own

More examples of this question type